Wednesday, March 30, 2016
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/319/583/case.html
What these appellants communicated were their beliefs and opinions [Footnote 8] concerning domestic measures and trends in national and world affairs.
Under our decisions, criminal sanctions cannot be imposed for such communication.
Taylor v. Mississippi, 319 U.S. 583 (1943)
Case involved Jehovas witnesses not respecting the flag. I'm researching cases about unconstitutional mississippi statutes, so this one fits pretty nicely with Barnette, one of the cases i am relying on.
supreme court, 1898, upholds all white juries.
Article 27 - REGULATION OF ELECTIONS
Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31 (1962). Mississippi statutes which required racial segregation at interstate and intrastate transportation facilities denied equal protection of the law.
915. M.L.B. v. S.L.J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
Mississippi statutes that condition appeals from trial court decrees terminating parental rights on the affected parent's ability to pay for preparation of a trial transcript violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/170/213supreme court, 1898, upholds all white juries.
Article 27 - REGULATION OF ELECTIONS
§ 23-15-875 - Prohibitions against charges with respect to integrity of candidate; proceedings against violators - moribund mississippi statute, see mills v alabama
23-15-877. Prohibitions against newspaper editorials and stories with respect to integrity of
candidate; newspaper's obligation to print reply; liability for damages.
moribund mississippi statute, see tornillo v miami herald
23-15-897. Requirement of candidate's subscription of printed campaign material; observance of
federal provisions with respect to radio and television time; payment for printed matter and for
broadcast time at usual rates.
- appears to ban independent expenditures? not sure which case to cite here.
23-15-899. Requirement that printed matter bear name of author, printer, and publisher;
prohibition against mutilation or removal of placards, posters, or pictures. -
talley v california
23-15-976. Judicial office deemed nonpartisan office; candidate for judicial office prohibited from
campaigning or qualifying for office based on party affiliation; prohibition on political party
fund-raising, campaigning, or contributions on behalf of candidate for judicial office. - mn gop v white? not sure on this one
Universal Citation: MS Code § 23-15-1025 (2013)
If any material is distributed by a judicial candidate or his campaign committee or any other person or entity, or at the request of the candidate, his campaign committee or any other person or entity distributing the material shall state that it is distributed by the candidate or that it is being distributed with the candidate's approval. All such material shall conspicuously identify who has prepared the material and who is distributing the material. The identifying language shall state whether or not the material has been submitted to and approved by the candidate. If the candidate has not approved the material, the material shall so state. The identity of organizations or committees shall state the names of all officers of the organizations or committees. Any person, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of One Thousand Dollars ($ 1,000.00) or by imprisonment for six (6) months or both fine and imprisonment. - void under talley v california
Comments:
Post a Comment
