Monday, February 08, 2016
update: the article below was cited at an even better one,
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/02/new-study-says-voter-id-laws-suppress-votes/?rf=1
still just in the blogs.
http://kut.org/post/study-backs-what-advocates-predicted-strict-voter-id-laws-reduce-minority-turnout
here's an austin radio station.
update: hasen:
http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2016/02/voter-id-laws-found-to-lower-minority.html
this paper is still tricking upward through the blogs and hasn't really hit the front pages yet,
bit i still think it's a bombshell. if the methodology and science holds up, finding 4% voter suppression of whites and 7% of blacks, it's the evidence any lawsuit needs to show a severe burden or equal protection issue or obstacle to voting (1st, 14th, 24th amendment respectively).
http://abovethelaw.com/2016/02/new-study-says-voter-id-laws-suppress-votes/?rf=1
still just in the blogs.
http://kut.org/post/study-backs-what-advocates-predicted-strict-voter-id-laws-reduce-minority-turnout
here's an austin radio station.
update: hasen:
Caution on the Hajnal Voter ID Paper
http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2016/02/voter-id-laws-found-to-lower-minority.html
this paper is still tricking upward through the blogs and hasn't really hit the front pages yet,
bit i still think it's a bombshell. if the methodology and science holds up, finding 4% voter suppression of whites and 7% of blacks, it's the evidence any lawsuit needs to show a severe burden or equal protection issue or obstacle to voting (1st, 14th, 24th amendment respectively).
Comments:
Post a Comment
