<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Monday, March 21, 2011

In for a calf is not in for Ahn Cao. (see Ginsberg concurring in McIntyre v Ohio.)
The Supreme Court denied cert in Cao v FEC, Richard Winger reports. The 5th circuit, which is now the most reversed circuit, had used the permissive Valeo standard in upholding limits to political party spending. Scotusblog.
update: hasen's post is "Don't have a Cao, man."

Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?