Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Maybe I'm tired. I seem to posting posts in the wrong blogs.
Meanwhile, is it fair to say we don't know anything about John Roberts stands on election law matters?
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Unless there's more to it, this is wrong:
# Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly [official website] has rejected a proposed ballot initiative which aims to repeal the state's new embryonic stem-cell research law. Reilly found the law religious in nature and stated that the state constitution and caselaw say that any law relating distinctively to religion can not go before voters. The law [text], which was passed in May 2005 over the Governor's veto, promotes embryonic stem-cell research in the state, but allows medical staff with "sincerely held religious practices or beliefs" exemption from such research. The Boston Herald has local coverage.
# posted by gt @ 18:11
Meanwhile, is it fair to say we don't know anything about John Roberts stands on election law matters?
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Unless there's more to it, this is wrong:
# Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly [official website] has rejected a proposed ballot initiative which aims to repeal the state's new embryonic stem-cell research law. Reilly found the law religious in nature and stated that the state constitution and caselaw say that any law relating distinctively to religion can not go before voters. The law [text], which was passed in May 2005 over the Governor's veto, promotes embryonic stem-cell research in the state, but allows medical staff with "sincerely held religious practices or beliefs" exemption from such research. The Boston Herald has local coverage.
# posted by gt @ 18:11
Comments:
Post a Comment
