<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Saturday, August 01, 2026

 outline

summary of argument

argument 

cert should be granted to resolve a split between the circuits as to talley v california. 

cert should be granted to confront a conflict under the supremacy clause  between the alaska court's rulings and this court's holdings in barnette, talley, tornillo, riley, wooley, roe, naacp bates, victoria buckley v aclf, mcintyre, meyer v grant, citizens united. 

cert should be granted to have tara malloy have 15 minutes to argue for the elections exception to the right to privacy the court rejected in 

argument 

 

 

cert should be granted to resolve a split between the circuits as to talley v california. 

30 to 20 split, list cases, see below. 

cert should be granted to confront a conflict under the supremacy clause  between the alaska court's rulings and this court's holdings in barnette, talley, tornillo, riley, wooley, roe, naacp bates, victoria buckley v aclf, mcintyre, meyer v grant, citizens united, janus, nifla, masterpiece, 303, salazar, first choice. [put in order] watchtower dale hurley 

cert should be granted to have tara malloy have 15 minutes to argue for the elections exception to the right to privacy the court rejected in mcintyre, while the unites states may argue the pro privacy angle.  

Freedom of speech is a primary value, but the issues of voter equality discussed in austin v michigan chamber, buckley v valeo, burson v  freeman and citizens united are important as well.  

 15 states have addressed this issue as a matter of state constitutional law. 13 of them have chosen to follow Talley. Two did not. 

  • Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phoenix, 247 Ariz. 269, 448 P.3d 890 (2019)
  • Canon v. Justice Court, 61 Cal. 2d 446, 393 P.2d 428, 39 Cal. Rptr. 228 (1964)
  • Ghafari v. Municipal Court, 87 Cal. App. 3d 255, 150 Cal. Rptr. 813 (1978)
  • Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons, 24 Cal. 4th 468, 12 P.3d 720, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470 (2000)
  • People v. Bongiorni, 205 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 85, 23 Cal. Rptr. 565 (1962)
  • People v. Drake, 97 Cal. App. 3d Supp. 32, 159 Cal. Rptr. 161 (1979)
  • Schuster v. Municipal Court, 109 Cal. App. 3d 887, 167 Cal. Rptr. 447 (1980)
  • Tattered Cover, Inc. v. City of Thornton, 44 P.3d 1044 (Colo. 2002)
  • Opinion of the Justices, 315 A.2d 580 (Del. 1974)
  • Doe v. Cahill, 884 A.2d 451 (Del. 2005)
  • Doe v. Mortham, 708 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1998)
  • People v. White, 116 Ill. 2d 171, 506 N.E.2d 1284, 107 Ill. Dec. 224 (1987)
  • Opinion of the Justices, 324 A.2d 211 (Me. 1974)
  • Opinion of the Justices, 363 Mass. 909, 298 N.E.2d 829 (1973)
  • Commonwealth v. Dennis, 368 Mass. 92, 329 N.E.2d 706 (1975)
  • Ex parte Harrison, 212 Mo. 88, 110 S.W. 709 (1908)
  • People v. Duryea, 76 Misc. 2d 948, 351 N.Y.S.2d 978 (Sup. Ct. 1974)
  • State v. Petersilie, 334 N.C. 169, 432 S.E.2d 832 (1993)
  • State v. North Dakota Education Ass'n, 262 N.W.2d 731 (N.D. 1978)
  • Commonwealth v. Wadzinski, 492 Pa. 35, 422 A.2d 124 (1980)
  • State v. Acey, 633 S.W.2d 306 (Tenn. 1982)
  • State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! Committee, 135 Wash. 2d 618, 957 P.2d 691 (1998)
    •  

     


    # posted by gt @ 5:02 PM

    Thursday, July 30, 2026

     https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article316687438.html

     

    Ms Williams, for some context, you might want to review talley v california, bates v little rock. gobitis, barnette, ghafari v san franciso, yick yo v hopkins, mcintyre v ohio elections comm'n, or any of the supreme court's recent first amendment cases like salazar, bonta, 303, first choice women's, etc. 

    the proposed legislation violates about 80 years of well established law under the state and federal constitutions. 








    Schiff proposes federal bill requiring influencers to disclose paid political ads
    The “Promoting Authenticity with Influencer Disclaimers Act” would amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to mandate that sponsored ...
    Facebook Twitter Flag as irrelevant

     


    # posted by gt @ 7:56 PM

    Wednesday, July 29, 2026

     

    • Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phoenix, 247 Ariz. 269, 448 P.3d 890 (2019)
    • Canon v. Justice Court, 61 Cal. 2d 446, 393 P.2d 428, 39 Cal. Rptr. 228 (1964)
    • Ghafari v. Municipal Court, 87 Cal. App. 3d 255, 150 Cal. Rptr. 813 (1978)
    • Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons, 24 Cal. 4th 468, 12 P.3d 720, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470 (2000)
    • People v. Bongiorni, 205 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 85, 23 Cal. Rptr. 565 (1962)
    • People v. Drake, 97 Cal. App. 3d Supp. 32, 159 Cal. Rptr. 161 (1979)
    • Schuster v. Municipal Court, 109 Cal. App. 3d 887, 167 Cal. Rptr. 447 (1980)
    • Tattered Cover, Inc. v. City of Thornton, 44 P.3d 1044 (Colo. 2002)
    • Opinion of the Justices, 315 A.2d 580 (Del. 1974)
    • Doe v. Cahill, 884 A.2d 451 (Del. 2005)
    • Doe v. Mortham, 708 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1998)
    • People v. White, 116 Ill. 2d 171, 506 N.E.2d 1284, 107 Ill. Dec. 224 (1987)
    • Opinion of the Justices, 324 A.2d 211 (Me. 1974)
    • Opinion of the Justices, 363 Mass. 909, 298 N.E.2d 829 (1973)
    • Commonwealth v. Dennis, 368 Mass. 92, 329 N.E.2d 706 (1975)
    • Ex parte Harrison, 212 Mo. 88, 110 S.W. 709 (1908)
    • People v. Duryea, 76 Misc. 2d 948, 351 N.Y.S.2d 978 (Sup. Ct. 1974)
    • State v. Petersilie, 334 N.C. 169, 432 S.E.2d 832 (1993)
    • State v. North Dakota Education Ass'n, 262 N.W.2d 731 (N.D. 1978)
    • Commonwealth v. Wadzinski, 492 Pa. 35, 422 A.2d 124 (1980)
    • State v. Acey, 633 S.W.2d 306 (Tenn. 1982)
    • State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! Committee, 135 Wash. 2d 618, 957 P.2d 691 (1998)
    Please let me know your next instruction once you have safely copied the list.

    # posted by gt @ 2:54 AM

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?