<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, August 14, 2016

http://www.sheboyganpress.com/story/opinion/2016/08/13/lemahieu-voter-id-ruling-judicial-overreach/88642160/

note to self: draft response. here are some notes toward that.

1  Wisconsin’s voter ID law was passed in 2011. Yet voters have had to show their IDs at the polls only three times since its enactment. Why? 
2  "activist judges"
3  Wisconsin has a proud history of open elections
4  It is important that our elections system remains accessible to all eligible voters. true dat.
5   Adelman’s and Peterson’s rulings fly in the face of the US Supreme Court’s previous decisions on voter ID.
6   Voter ID is equally as important because it ensures the validity of each vote
7  In fact a vast majority of states, 34, have a voter ID law in place 
8  and the US Supreme Court has confirmed its legality
9  Just last year, the SCOTUS refused to hear a challenge to Wisconsin’s specific voter ID law- maintaining it was constitutional.
10   As Chairman of the Senate Elections Committee, I will continue to work to ensure Wisconsin’s elections remain fair and secure.
1  why? because at least 4 courts have found serious constitutional problems with the scheme.
2  "activist judges"
3  Wisconsin has a proud history of open elections
4  It is important that our elections system remains accessible to all eligible voters. true dat.
5   Adelman’s and Peterson’s rulings fly in the face of the US Supreme Court’s previous decisions on voter ID.
6   Voter ID is equally as important because it ensures the validity of each vote
7  In fact a vast majority of states, 34, have a voter ID law in place 
8  and the US Supreme Court has confirmed its legality
9  Just last year, the SCOTUS refused to hear a challenge to Wisconsin’s specific voter ID law- maintaining it was constitutional.
10   As Chairman of the Senate Elections Committee, I will continue to work to ensure Wisconsin’s elections remain fair and secure.




Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?