Saturday, April 23, 2016
Hall noted that the preliminary data that show 29,000 voters used the two provisions also reveal that 1,320 ballots were rejected because voters did not provide proper ID to poll officials.
Finally some North Carolina data. Is there any way to know how many of each party?
http://themountaineer.villagesoup.com/p/29-000-voters-saved-by-measures-targeted-by-legislators/1513596
update: the decision in the N Carolina voting rights case is for the state, as expected. less expected, it's over 400 pages.
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=82224
It's not that 29,000 people will be disenfranchised; the state will argue they can just adjust to the new methods, that inconvenience is not severe burden. But actual numbers help plaintiff make their case.
1320 is non-trivial.
Finally some North Carolina data. Is there any way to know how many of each party?
http://themountaineer.villagesoup.com/p/29-000-voters-saved-by-measures-targeted-by-legislators/1513596
update: the decision in the N Carolina voting rights case is for the state, as expected. less expected, it's over 400 pages.
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=82224
It's not that 29,000 people will be disenfranchised; the state will argue they can just adjust to the new methods, that inconvenience is not severe burden. But actual numbers help plaintiff make their case.
1320 is non-trivial.
Comments:
Post a Comment
