Sunday, March 27, 2016
a couple of disclaimer cases i need to add to my files
candidate”); Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley, 291 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 1067-69 (D. Minn. 2003) (striking disclaimer requirement that applied to “any . . . material tending to influence voting . . . except for news items or editorial comments by the news media” on the grounds that the definition was unconstitutionally vague and that the exception granted to individuals who independently distribute small amounts of campaign materials was insufficient to satisfy McIntyre), rev’d on other grounds 427 F.3d 1106 (8th Cir. 2005); Doe v. Mortham, 708 So. 2d 929, 934-35 (Fla. 1998) (striking requirement that advertisement state name and address of sponsor, while upholding requirement that ad state “Paid political advertisement”); Riley v. Jankowski, 713 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006)
http://www.fergusfallsjournal.com/2015/01/election-violations-complaint-dismissed/
minnesota has re-enacted, for a third time, its unconstitutional disclaimer statute.
i should do something about that.
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=1569
Guetzloe v. Fla. Elections Comm’n, 927 So.2d 942, 945 (Fla. App. 2006)
- friend of mine, Doug Guetzloe, who went to jail for a disclaimer violation.
h Arkansas Right to Life, 29 F. Supp. 2d 540, 550 (W.D. Ark. 1998)
if this is the butler case, i understand better now that at first i thought it followed mcintyre and then later that it didnt. one of the issues may have won below and not been appealed.
candidate”); Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley, 291 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 1067-69 (D. Minn. 2003) (striking disclaimer requirement that applied to “any . . . material tending to influence voting . . . except for news items or editorial comments by the news media” on the grounds that the definition was unconstitutionally vague and that the exception granted to individuals who independently distribute small amounts of campaign materials was insufficient to satisfy McIntyre), rev’d on other grounds 427 F.3d 1106 (8th Cir. 2005); Doe v. Mortham, 708 So. 2d 929, 934-35 (Fla. 1998) (striking requirement that advertisement state name and address of sponsor, while upholding requirement that ad state “Paid political advertisement”); Riley v. Jankowski, 713 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006)
http://www.fergusfallsjournal.com/2015/01/election-violations-complaint-dismissed/
minnesota has re-enacted, for a third time, its unconstitutional disclaimer statute.
i should do something about that.
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=1569
Guetzloe v. Fla. Elections Comm’n, 927 So.2d 942, 945 (Fla. App. 2006)
- friend of mine, Doug Guetzloe, who went to jail for a disclaimer violation.
h Arkansas Right to Life, 29 F. Supp. 2d 540, 550 (W.D. Ark. 1998)
if this is the butler case, i understand better now that at first i thought it followed mcintyre and then later that it didnt. one of the issues may have won below and not been appealed.
Comments:
Post a Comment
