Thursday, October 16, 2014
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=66976
New Hampshire Supreme Court Finds Push-Polling Law Preempted
I would have preferred for Justin to use the term 'disclaimer' rather than 'disclosure".
But I agree with the court's reasoning and outcome.
I am one of the country's harshest critics of disclaimer statutes generally.
The one place a disclaimer can be required is a phone call, because it is an intrusion into personal space in the way that a TV or print ad isn't, even a google-targeted print ad. But state regulations are preempted for federal candidates.
I am one of the country's harshest critics of disclaimer statutes generally.
The one place a disclaimer can be required is a phone call, because it is an intrusion into personal space in the way that a TV or print ad isn't, even a google-targeted print ad. But state regulations are preempted for federal candidates.
Comments:
Post a Comment
